Human resources at a click

Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) in discrimination cases

office_chairs_meeting_coffee_table

The Women and Equalities Select Committee (“WESC”) has called for the government to either ban or reset the parameters on which NDAs are used by employers to silence employees’ allegations of unlawful discrimination and harassment in the workplace.

The WESC has commented that it is “completely unacceptable that allegations of unlawful discrimination and harassment in the workplace are routinely covered up by employers with legally drafted NDAs”. It has also been found that, as a result of the use of NDAs, such allegations are not investigated properly, or sometimes not at all, by employers.

The imbalance of power between employers and employees, particularly in large organisations, is said to be one of the “key drivers” behind the use of NDAs. Some employers are using their significant resources to put considerable pressure on employees who pursue allegations of discrimination or harassment at tribunal. Employees are therefore often left feeling as though they have little option but to accept settlement on the terms offered by their employer.

The WESC has also expressed further concerns that the online publication of tribunal judgements has increased the risk of claimants being blacklisted by future employers, which is acting as a further deterrent to potential claimants bringing such claims and therefore agreeing to enter into NDAs.

 

The WESC has commented that it is “completely unacceptable that allegations of unlawful discrimination and harassment in the workplace are routinely covered up by employers with legally drafted NDAs”.

The recommendations submitted within the report are that the Government should:

  • ensure that NDAs cannot prevent legitimate discussion of allegations of unlawful discrimination or harassment and to protect the rights of victims;
  • require standard, plain English confidentiality, non-derogatory and similar clauses to ensure clarity as to what information can and cannot be shared and with whom;
  • strengthen corporate governance requirements to require employers to meet their responsibilities to protect those they employ from discrimination and harassment; and
  • require named senior managers at board level or similar to oversee anti-discrimination and harassment policies and the use of NDAs.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking professional and legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Anonymous author

Related Articles

For discrimination and detriment cases, compensation can also cover non-financial losses, which, in most cases, will include an injury to...

As we mark International Women’s Day 2025, it’s essential to reflect on the current state of gender equality in the...

We have seen a lot of disparities between younger and older people, particularly relating to working arrangements and the “digital...

Related Resources

The gender pay gap factsheet

This factsheet provides guidance on the regulation for the gender pay gap. Introduction The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap...

Age discrimination factsheet

This factsheet covers types of age discrimination and its impact in the workplace. Who is protected? “Age” is one of...

Public sector equality duty factsheet

Guidance on the public sector equality duty for public sector bodies. Single Public Sector Equality Duty The Public Sector Equality...

Human resources at a click