Human resources at a click

Employment Status: Courier’s ability to ‘release’ job was not an automatic right to substitute

automotive_car_headlights

In Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine 2019, the EAT upheld the employment tribunal’s findings that a delivery courier was a ‘worker’ under S.230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The Claimant was a delivery courier who undertook fixed time slots for the Respondent. During the fixed slot, the Claimant was confined to his agreed operation zone and undertook deliveries that were offered to him via an app for an agreed hourly wage. He could not hold himself out as being available to other delivery companies during this time.

The Claimant was able to release the slot assigned to him to be picked up by other couriers in the area via SD Ltd’s app. However, if no other courier accepted, then the Claimant was duty bound to complete his allocated deliveries.

SD Ltd argued that the Claimant was self-employed as the ability to release his slot to other couriers amounted to a right to substitute. However, the tribunal considered that this was not the character of a substitution clause that would deny him ‘worker’ status.

SD Ltd appealed the decision but the EAT upheld the tribunal’s findings.

The EAT upheld the employment tribunal’s findings that a delivery courier was a ‘worker’ under S.230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The EAT agreed that the tribunal had correctly found that the Claimant could only be released from his obligation to perform the deliveries himself if another courier signed up to his slot. This meant he had no control over whether the delivery would be picked up or by whom if released.

This therefore did not amount to a ‘right’ of substitution and so did not undermine the requirement for personal service, under s230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Link to transcript: https://www.gov.uk/employment-appeal-tribunal-decisions/stuart-delivery-ltd-v-mr-warren-augustine-ukeat-0219-18-ba

Employment status has a significant impact on your obligations as an employer. With the upcoming changes to the IR35 rules, determining the employment status of your workforce is paramount. To speak to one of our experts about employment status click here.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking professional and legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Louise_Keenan
Louise Keenan
Associate

Related Articles

A Tesco sales assistant who had worked at the supermarket for 26 years was unfairly dismissed after she was “erroneously”...

A railway firm team leader with controller of site safety status was unfairly dismissed after he incorrectly communicated a line...

Employees with two year’s continuous service have the right not to be unfairly dismissed (and no length of services is...

Related Resources

Directors and senior executives negotiating an exit factsheet

Detailed guide for negotiating an exit for directors and senior executives. Introduction Increasingly, organisations are recognising that their most valuable...

Request for return of company property

Template letter requesting the return of company property. Preview of letter Dear [name of employee] RETURN OF COMPANY PROPERTY We...

Constructive dismissal factsheet

Guide to constructive dismissal. Introduction An employee is entitled to resign with or without notice or with short notice if...

Human resources at a click