Human resources at a click

Union bids for recognition with end user not employer

office-working-going-through-security-turnstiles-reception

This week a trade union, IWGB, has applied for statutory recognition to represent a group of receptionists, security officers and porters who work at the University of London even though these workers are employed by Cordant Security, a facilities management company with the contract to provide services to the University.

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Even if the financial terms of Cordant’s contract with the University place a practical limit on Cordant’s scope for increasing the pay of these workers, and University managers can instruct Cordant employees to carry out certain tasks, it is very difficult to see how the union can substantiate its claim that the University is the “de facto employer” unless there is evidence that Cordant is not the actual employer responsible for matters such as hiring, pay, disciplinaries and grievances.

 

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

It will therefore be very surprising if this application results in either a finding that the union can negotiate directly with the University or that UK law is in breach of ECHR.

There is no suggestion that there is anything preventing the union from seeking recognition by Cordant, provided it meets the statutory tests. The union has in fact done so, albeit without media fanfare, at the same time as its application for direct recognition by the University.

This is an interesting one to keep track of…watch this space for updates as this progresses.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking professional and legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Anonymous author

Related Articles

Monica Atwal outlines the changes employers need to be aware of following the government’s repeal of the Strikes Act. On...

The Government has recently announced that the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 will be repealed. This Act had only...

The headlines are currently dominated by strikes across a range of sectors. We are seeing post workers, refuge workers, barristers...

Related Resources

Responding to an IC request where request already made in the last 3 years

Template letter responding to an IC request where request already made in the last 3 years. Preview of letter...

Industrial action ballot process checklist

Checklist providing the process of an industrial action ballot. If any of these stages have not been followed then it...

Letter to employees who made IC request where less than 40 percent supported

Template letter to employees who made IC request where less than 40 percent supported. Preview of letter Letter to employees...

Human resources at a click